dave on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:56 p.m.
We took the total rake paid in a huge number of games and divided it by the total number of players in those games to get the amount paid per player per hand on average. Looser players will obviously...
View Articlemr_sam on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:50 p.m.
Could you at all classify what you mean by 'average player' please?
View Articledave on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:47 p.m.
@ Shevtshenko We calculated based upon the average number of players at the table so the differences in the max players at the table will be taken into account. @lolwhat Thanks for the support. We'll...
View Articlelolwhat on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:41 p.m.
Good job again, imo. Maybe PTR makes money with information you´re not supposed to have/obtain in the first place, but whether that´s true or not (regarding the supposed to have part), you seem to make...
View Articlejaydt1124 on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:34 p.m.
FT vs Stars numbers including better VIP program at stars = I know where I am going once I cash in my points at FT.
View ArticleShevtshenko on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:33 p.m.
FT's fr tables are 9-handed, is that taken into account here?
View Articlellll on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:19 p.m.
dealt rake depends on VPIP ? that is a scam obv, and i kinda like the fact i changed my whole game from FT to PS even more now.next year i will get better $ with all stars promo than at FT rakeback...
View Articledave on Aug. 31, 2010, 3:03 p.m.
As far as our methods go, this is a fairly simple one. We are going to look into things beyond the average price in the days to come. @Donkey41 We did include the bbj for party as well but I didn't...
View Articlesoche on Aug. 31, 2010, 2:59 p.m.
I can't believe stars is getting away with screwing over the frenchies. If they think they can do the same in the US "IF" we get regulation, they are sorely mistaken. I am positive that Americans will...
View ArticleDonkey41 on Aug. 31, 2010, 2:58 p.m.
There is a huge jump in rake for Party between 10NL and 25NL. Therefore I assume that you have included the 25NL jackpot tables since they don't exist at 10NL.
View Articledave on Aug. 31, 2010, 2:47 p.m.
We will be making that data available as well. This is just a start.
View Articlethecrocodiledave on Aug. 31, 2010, 2:45 p.m.
This should be done w/ the sites various rakebacks as well factored in.
View Articleh_ven on Aug. 31, 2010, 2:40 p.m.
PTR, Is the Cereus BBJP rake included in the above rake table? If not, why is Cereus so much higher?
View Article
